THE FUTURE MARKETACADEMY
Your classroomRoom 13 · Library
School of Student Essentials

Exam Strategies: planning and practice

Step 7 of 9 in Library

Next in your path: 13.10.2 Research Methods: search and evaluate

What you'll be able to do
  • Judge your own study methods against what research says, including how big the effects really are.
  • Build a spaced revision schedule that fits the number of days you have.
  • Use retrieval practice, mixed practice and self-explanation in the right places.
  • Run full timed practice exams, and turn every mistake into a plan.
  • Combine all of this into one exam-season plan you can show.

Before this course: Exam Prep & Test-Taking (course 13.16). You already know how to plan backwards from the exam date, rate topics red, yellow and green, test yourself instead of rereading, use strategies for each question type, look after sleep and nerves, and sort your mistakes into four types. Here we go one step deeper: how well each method really works, how to schedule it, and how to practise like the real exam.

This course is about study skills. Study research shows averages across many students, not a promise for you. If stress or worry is affecting your health, talk to a parent, teacher, school counsellor or doctor. In Canada, Kids Help Phone is open 24/7: call 1-800-668-6868 or text CONNECT to 686868.

Words in this course 43Open the Vocabulary Hall
01

Audit your study methods with honest evidence

In simple words

Some ways of studying feel good, like reading your notes again and again, because it all looks familiar. But looking familiar and being able to remember are different things. A good coach checks the score, not just the feeling.

Key facts
  • In a major 2013 review (Dunlosky and colleagues, in Psychological Science in the Public Interest), researchers rated ten study techniques for how useful they are:
RatingTechniques
HighPractice testing, distributed (spaced) practice
ModerateElaborative interrogation, self-explanation, interleaved practice
LowSummarization, highlighting and underlining, keyword mnemonic, imagery for text, rereading
  • The authors said the low-rated methods can help some students on some tasks, but the conditions are narrow. The moderate-rated ones help across some conditions, but the evidence was more limited.
  • Be honest about limits. A "high" rating means the method was shown to help across many kinds of tests and learners. It does not mean it will help you by a fixed amount, and most of the research is on short tasks, not whole courses.
  • Learning styles: a 2008 review (Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer and Bjork) found no adequate evidence to justify giving students teaching matched to a "learning style" in general classroom practice. The authors also said that does not prove every version is wrong, only that the evidence for it is missing. So do not pick methods by "I am a visual learner." Pick them by what works.
  • Feeling vs result: a technique that feels easy (rereading) can be less effective than one that feels harder (testing yourself). Check by results: scores on practice questions.
Step by step
  1. List every way you studied for your last test: for example reread notes, highlighted, made flashcards, did practice questions, made summaries.
  2. Next to each, write its rating from the table: high, moderate or low.
  3. Count the minutes you spent on each method.
  4. Circle the biggest low-rated item. Decide to replace half of that time with a high-rated method.
  5. Write the replacement as a calendar entry for this week.
  6. Check: your next study week has at least two high-rated sessions on the calendar, and you can name the method for each.
Watch on YouTube
Retrieval practice: a video for studentsThe Learning Scientists · YouTube · youtube.com

Videos by other creators on YouTube, for reference. They are not made by or affiliated with The Future Market.

LESSON 01Audit your study methods with honest evidence
LESSON 01 / ANIMATED LESSON / AI VOICE00:00 / 01:00
Read the video script
[Host] "Does your study method work? Or does it just feel like it works?"
[Text on screen: High: practice testing, spacing. Low: rereading, highlighting.] "A big 2013 review rated ten methods. Testing and spacing were high. Rereading and highlighting were low."
[Host] "And learning styles? No adequate evidence to base teaching on them."
[Screen: study log with minutes per method] "Track your minutes. Swap time from low methods into high ones."
Try it now

Make your study-method audit for your last exam and replace one low-rated habit with a high-rated one in this week's plan.

ClaudeStuck? Copy a ready-made prompt for Claude

Copy this, open Claude, paste it, and Claude will walk you through the lesson step by step.

For a grown-up: Claude is for adults (18+). Copy this, paste it into Claude, and use the answer to explain the lesson to your child.

I'm learning "Exam Strategies: planning and practice" on The Future Market. Lesson 1: "Audit your study methods with honest evidence".

What the lesson teaches:
- In a major 2013 review (Dunlosky and colleagues, in Psychological Science in the Public Interest), researchers rated ten study techniques for how useful they are:
- Rating - Techniques
- High - Practice testing, distributed (spaced) practice
- Moderate - Elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, interleaved practice
- Low - Summarization, highlighting and underlining, keyword mnemonic, imagery for text, rereading
- The authors said the low-rated methods can help some students on some tasks, but the conditions are narrow. The moderate-rated ones help across some conditions, but the evidence was more limited.
- Be honest about limits. A "high" rating means the method was shown to help across many kinds of tests and learners. It does not mean it will help you by a fixed amount, and most of the research is on short tasks, not whole courses.

The exercise I'm working on:
Make your study-method audit for your last exam and replace one low-rated habit with a high-rated one in this week's plan.

I'm stuck. Please:
1. Explain the main idea in plain, simple words with one everyday example.
2. Walk me through the exercise one small step at a time. Ask me what I've done so far before giving the next step.
3. Don't just give me the final answer. Help me do it myself, and check my work when I share it.
I'm a parent helping my child (about 8 years old) with a lesson called "Audit your study methods with honest evidence" from the course "Exam Strategies: planning and practice".

Here's what the lesson says:
Some ways of studying feel good, like reading your notes again and again, because it all looks familiar. But looking familiar and being able to remember are different things. A good coach checks the score, not just the feeling.

The activity:
Make your study-method audit for your last exam and replace one low-rated habit with a high-rated one in this week's plan.

Please explain this so an 8-year-old understands: short sentences, a fun everyday example, and no hard words.
Then give me 3 simple questions I can ask my child to check they understood, and a way to do the activity together, one tiny step at a time.
Open Claude
Sources
My notes
02

Spacing: choose the gap for your exam date

This lesson is part of full access: every course and every level for one payment.

03

Retrieval practice at full strength

This lesson is part of full access: every course and every level for one payment.

04

Mixed practice: when interleaving helps and when it does not

This lesson is part of full access: every course and every level for one payment.

05

Explain it to learn it

This lesson is part of full access: every course and every level for one payment.

06

Practise like the real exam

This lesson is part of full access: every course and every level for one payment.

07

Your exam-season system

This lesson is part of full access: every course and every level for one payment.

++

Final project

This lesson is part of full access: every course and every level for one payment.

??

Quiz

  1. Which two techniques did the 2013 review rate highest?

  2. Name two low-rated techniques.

  3. What did the 2008 review find about learning styles?

  4. How does the best gap between sessions change as the exam gets further away?

  5. In the 2006 testing study, who did better on a test five minutes later, and who did better two days and one week later?

  6. What average effect did Rowland (2014) report for testing versus restudy?

  7. Why check your answers after retrieval practice?

  8. When does interleaving help most, and where did blocking do better?

  9. For a 120-minute exam worth 100 marks, about how many minutes should a 5-mark question get?

  10. Why predict your mark before marking a practice exam?

  11. How much sleep do health guidelines usually recommend for ages 14 to 17?

  12. Who can you reach out to if exam worry feels too big?

EX

Final exam

This lesson is part of full access: every course and every level for one payment.

CE

Certificate

This lesson is part of full access: every course and every level for one payment.